Watch a fly-through animation of Notre-Dame rebuilt with a reconstructed spire and glass roof

Miysis Studio has created an animation showing its vision of a rebuilt Notre-Dame that combines a reconstruction of Viollet-le-Duc spire with a modern glass roof.The Belgium visualisation studio created the movie to show how the cathedral, which was devastated by fire last month, could be rebuilt using modern and traditional materials.
Read more on Dezeen:
WATCH NEXT: Lasers and drones are preserving world heritage sites -
Subscribe to our MNproject channel for the latest architecture and design movies:
Like Dezeen on Facebook: dezeen/
Follow Dezeen on Twitter: Dezeen/
Follow us on Instagram: dezeen
Check out our Pinterest:

Татаж авах

Үзсэн тоо


  • hell no

    Freedom Loving LoyalistFreedom Loving Loyalist13 өдрийн өмнө
  • No no no

    Phúc NguyễnPhúc Nguyễn13 өдрийн өмнө
  • Sure it looks cool but its still a church.

    Dallin BissettDallin BissettСарын өмнө
  • If this gets fucking built I’m gonna puke

    TheGamingPoliticianTheGamingPoliticianСарын өмнө
    • I hate historical buildings

      Skywind rSkywind r23 өдрийн өмнө
  • I'd see that in a Buddhist monastery. Not a Catholic church.

    This GuyThis GuyСарын өмнө
  • After the fire last year I never cried, I thought I was sure they are going to restore the same exact roof and the spire, so instead of rusty old it be just brand new from the 12th century looking they do, I wasn't thinking this would end like that like how I feel bad about the two twin towers in New York never got rebuilt that people there wanted it back not the freedom tower and this new roof makes it not look like a decent 800 year old cathedral nor like in the animation movie I got into recently with the animated Disney version of Notre Dame from The Hunchback of Notre Dame and what, they shall not design like that, it doesn't feel right for the Notre Dame lovers, cus it's not a garden apartment building!

    KawayoporuKawayoporuСарын өмнө
  • music don't match not the roof!

    Margaret MMargaret MСарын өмнө
  • Can you Imagine three gargoyles: Victor, Hugo, and Laverne would be surprised about the indoor garden on top of the cathedral?

    Erin DurkinErin DurkinСарын өмнө
  • It's a temple. Why does it need a roof garden?

    Dimitris TsekerisDimitris TsekerisСарын өмнө
  • Wtf? Wtf??? 🥺

    tomal74tomal74Сарын өмнө
  • Globalist trash. Return it to how it originally was.

    Appalled ByFurriesAppalled ByFurries2 сарын өмнө
    • Nah

      Skywind rSkywind rСарын өмнө
  • That looks great

    Marcel GeigerMarcel Geiger2 сарын өмнө
  • That does look cool but don't do that on a fucking cathedral. While we're at lets put a swimming pool atop Buckingham palce.

    Willam ********Willam ********3 сарын өмнө
  • 420000 lb of lead is now contaminating every square inch of that building it's a toxic nightmare and it will never be cleaned up they will cover it up until Doomsday. At least they're admitting to how toxic the LED is on the streets outside

    James DavisJames Davis3 сарын өмнө
  • #Gothic 💝

    Clara RosaClara Rosa3 сарын өмнө
  • Why must it be modernized? Modern architecture is atrocious. Modern construction techniques/safety measures should be used, but aesthetically, Notre Dame should as close to pre-fire as possible.

    ddylla85ddylla853 сарын өмнө
  • crass decadent zionist shit.

    aubi faedraaubi faedra3 сарын өмнө
  • Notre Dame should show it's age. That there never was a way to make it better . . . including replacing the 19th century spire.

    Andre NewcombAndre Newcomb3 сарын өмнө
  • It does look cool, but I really want the Notre Dame to be built back exactly the same as it was before

    Max ScottMax Scott3 сарын өмнө
  • It will be very hot there. Huuge glass area for the sun to heat up that thing

    Lukas SchällibaumLukas Schällibaum6 сарын өмнө
  • They NEED to do this!

    J.R. ProductionsJ.R. Productions6 сарын өмнө
  • If France wants to ruin Paris, go for it

    Valentin RoeslerValentin Roesler6 сарын өмнө
  • How about restoring the visual appearance of the cathedral to how it was before the fire.....but using modern more fire resistant materials and modern building safety standards? Modernists get the updates they want only with modern building materials while traditionalists get back the cathedral as how it looked before. But the real winner would be the cathedral itself in that it would get fire resistant materials and work that meets modern building codes making it less likely for a major fire like what happened to occur again.

    tamiasthechipmunktamiasthechipmunk7 сарын өмнө
    • They are using wood to rebuild it

      cunardcunard2 сарын өмнө
  • Only satan would use modern glass/steel architecture too rebuild something this magnificent. No surprise with the Catholic minions of satan, disgusting 🤡🔥

    United NetherlandsUnited Netherlands8 сарын өмнө
  • Never going to happen, this ancient European cathedral is not your toy for your disgusting and ugly postmodernist fantasies

    AmadísAmadís8 сарын өмнө
  • And whilst they are at it, why not repaint the Mona Lisa's head as a rabbit. Same psychology.

    ??8 сарын өмнө
    • Wow. That would make all the art magazines, as well as the evening news. I am sure the merchandising on that would be highly lucrative. Jeff Koons, are you listening?

      Noe BerengenaNoe Berengena7 сарын өмнө
  • Terrible idea for Notre Dame!

    globalmonkeyglobalmonkey8 сарын өмнө
  • NO!!!!!!!!

    Harald HoelHarald Hoel8 сарын өмнө
  • i think its a good idea

    Gr8SuccessGr8Success9 сарын өмнө
  • The only positive side of this half-wit proposal is that they held back from proposing turning it into a trendy a shopping mall with Starbucks under the spire!

    ??9 сарын өмнө
  • Building it back to it's original shape is architectural falacy because we do not longer live in the time when the original roof was made. Notre Dame is not original from one epoque but a palimpsest of many. Just like Le Duc's XIX century spire was, in it's time, a modern re imagination of how ideal gothic should be. (Neo gothic) So, why not honor the memory of the fire with XXI century adition?

    luemsaga1994luemsaga19949 сарын өмнө
    • Better yet, why not execute a XXII century addition?

      Noe BerengenaNoe Berengena7 сарын өмнө
    • The original shape before the fire, which makes the building beautiful and not a disgusting postmodernist grotesque aberration. "We" don't need to honor the memory of a catastrophe by doing another. And are you even French? because this whole "we" is very funny, you have no power to say what the French have to do with their cultural legacy

      AmadísAmadís8 сарын өмнө
  • J'adore 💋

    Oiled Up And Ready !Oiled Up And Ready !9 сарын өмнө
  • i like it except may be to much green stuff like in an office

    remyposeesremyposees10 сарын өмнө
  • <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="40">0:40</a> It does look pretty... But I don’t think it’s needed.

    MarioSonic2010MarioSonic201010 сарын өмнө
  • It would be more respectuful to leave it as it is: destroyed. RIP France

    Robert FrippRobert Fripp10 сарын өмнө
  • Water leaking glass roof, oh h3ll no! I haven't seen one that hasn't leaked.

    Tim WTim W10 сарын өмнө
  • I like it. It’s a really pretty idea. The only thing that pisses me off, is that they would build the roof with wood. That’s a good chunk of the reason why the fire spread so easily, was because of the wood roof.

    Liftmaster1280Liftmaster128010 сарын өмнө
  • How fucking dare you. Take your piece of shit design andf fuck right off, philistines.

    Gus WGus W10 сарын өмнө
  • Somebody seems to have forgotten that it is a CHURCH,not an amusement park!they can build such a modern cathedral somewhere else, but not in Paris!

    drabtoka 76drabtoka 7610 сарын өмнө
    • Neirea Heydensee That’s the point. All the modern bullshit in Paris needs to get the fuck back up the Speer’s asshole. It’s absolutely disgusting that one of the only respites from these eyesore is actively threatened by these authoritarian brutalist moronic architects.

      SharkboiSharkboi4 сарын өмнө
    • drabtoka 76 way not in Paris. I think you know nothing about Paris. You have many modern structures, buildings and skycrapers in Paris. Paris cannot be restricted to the historic center, where all tourists come but a very tiny part of Paris.

      CreolophusCreolophus9 сарын өмнө
  • No one beats Eugène Emmanuel Violett-le-Duc's design. Rebuild it exactly like it was, and paint certain ornaments in gold.

    OminousOminous10 сарын өмнө
  • Take a medieval cathedral and turn it into a shopping mall. When do we as a people take a step back and realize we fuck everything.

    Trenten PTrenten P10 сарын өмнө
  • A monumental, 7-century cathedral turned to a church with a greenhouse/recreation park on the top. I'm absolutely astonished how progressive we are! They could as well open a kiosk selling hamburgers and a pub!

    Se PaSe Pa10 сарын өмнө
    • @Presidentialnurse2040 Futurenurse they were being sarcastic

      LucidDreamer EntertainmentLucidDreamer Entertainment13 өдрийн өмнө

      Presidentialnurse2040 FuturenursePresidentialnurse2040 Futurenurse3 сарын өмнө
    • How soon could we get a mini food court, where urban hep cats can stare into their iPads and iPhones as they munch on almond croissants and drink espressos? The main thing the glass roof scheme does is create an observation deck to look over the city of Paris in all directions. Is that a good thing? Yes? No?

      Noe BerengenaNoe Berengena7 сарын өмнө
  • I like how the glass is made to have the same color as the original roof, and has the same silhouette/shape. I also like that le Duc's spire is faithfully reconstructed. The greenery inside however is pretty generic, something more interesting could be done there. Overall, I'd still vastly prefer rebuilding it as it was with modern reinforcement/fireproofing, but if it *has* to be something modern, this would be fine. It is a fine compromise. Probably the only good suggestion I've seen so far for a a new design.

    marvelfannumber1marvelfannumber110 сарын өмнө
  • Why not just built it back to how it was originally?

    evil22565 • 1 year agoevil22565 • 1 year ago10 сарын өмнө
    • ꧁Gabriel Alvarado꧂ Board by board.

      SharkboiSharkboi4 сарын өмнө
    • How do you think they will?

      luis alvaradoluis alvarado8 сарын өмнө
  • I have to admit, it looks really cool. But it's a huge disrespect to the French and their cultural heritage.

    Robbe NagelRobbe Nagel10 сарын өмнө
    • It’s much better than other designs

      thediamondshardthediamondshard2 сарын өмнө
    • @FourLeafMagnolia It'll be a prayer garden.

      J.R. ProductionsJ.R. Productions6 сарын өмнө
    • Who cares it looks cool

      Sonic 27Sonic 276 сарын өмнө
    • @FourLeafMagnolia Most monastery of the same period had either a garden or cloister featuring a place with open sky to think to the outer space.

      Escargot C'estEscargot C'est10 сарын өмнө
    • @Can we get 100 subs without any vids? A place of recreation and noise on top of a place of worship and quietness. Why dontcha just open up a s.c. up there?

      FourLeafMagnoliaFourLeafMagnolia10 сарын өмнө
  • while it does a nice nod to original buildings architecture for a modern design, I am still not sold on the idea because it is modernist architecture, most people want Notre Dame rebuilt how it was to restore the history that was lost.

    KurturmisKurturmis10 сарын өмнө
    • @Vance L. Gilmore there are alot of people that dont like modern buildings the reason why these buildings get so much toerists is because they are beautiful and should stay that way

      Mr royMr roy6 сарын өмнө
  • modern architecture is crap

    James GunninghamJames Gunningham10 сарын өмнө
    • Old is

      Skywind rSkywind rСарын өмнө
  • No the wooden roof suits the building better

    Joey OhalloranJoey Ohalloran10 сарын өмнө
  • Fire in the forest ... terrifying but renewing

    Waltayr Dantas FilhoWaltayr Dantas Filho10 сарын өмнө
  • Looks like a London park not a cathedral...

    MooMoo10 сарын өмнө

    FourLeafMagnoliaFourLeafMagnolia10 сарын өмнө
    • Pretty much, yes.

      Gus WGus W10 сарын өмнө
  • j'hésite encore ...mais ce genre de projet avec du verre me plairait assez et me semblerait respectueux et d'aujourd'hui ...après le coté galerie marchande cela manque encore de spiritualité !

    Phi VincePhi Vince10 сарын өмнө
  • It still looks Hideous Put it back the way it was before the fire.

    Waffel ReitterWaffel Reitter10 сарын өмнө
  • the glass is kind of cool but the 'rooftop' garden concept reminds me of nearly every proposed redevelopment/modern apartment building iv'e seen in the last decade. it's a very nice but generic concept. In 200 hundred years they might wish we had just restored it to how it was, because anything we do to 'update' it by current modern standards with fall out of fashion in the coming decades anyway.

    Tristan JallehTristan Jalleh10 сарын өмнө
  • They should next burn down the EU parliament and replace it with something more traditional.

    Sy SharpSy Sharp10 сарын өмнө
  • Notre-Damnnn

    RyanRyan10 сарын өмнө
  • Glass doesn't mean modern...i dont like it

    MrDelvoyeMrDelvoye10 сарын өмнө
    • @MrDelvoye I second this Notion

      Waffel ReitterWaffel Reitter10 сарын өмнө
    • @MrDelvoye agreed

      mistaTmistaT10 сарын өмнө
    • @mistaT a simple restoration would be a good thing

      MrDelvoyeMrDelvoye10 сарын өмнө
    • so what if it "doesn't mean modern ", what the fuck has that got to do with restoring such a monument as the Notre Dame?

      mistaTmistaT10 сарын өмнө
  • Guys and aliens can u join my sexy channel,🤔🙄 i need to buy a car

    HowsotopeHowsotope10 сарын өмнө
  • this is actually a beautiful concept

    kobe navarrokobe navarro10 сарын өмнө
    • Chinggis Han i get that but what’s so wrong with controversy? if not every, almost every noteable piece of architecture was controversial at its time that’s how it grows and develops. buildings survive by adapting with the times. people thought gaudi was crazy as fuck but now look at how his pieces stand. i get the point you’re trying to make but i think it only further supports the unique-ness and talents of the architect.

      kobe navarrokobe navarro10 сарын өмнө
    • kobe navarro Listen The best way to avoid any kind of controversy From any people Is to simply rebuild it to the way it was. So many bullets from the public could be dodged. So much controversy could be avoided.

      Chinggis HanChinggis Han10 сарын өмнө
    • Chinggis Han i don’t think it was going for a park but even just a more sustainable design for a building as large as it is. i think being a public building that brings a lot of attraction to it anyways it’ll be nice to have a space for tourists that can be separate from the church’s masses

      kobe navarrokobe navarro10 сарын өмнө
    • @Chinggis Han agreed. No need for a place to 'chill'.

      FourLeafMagnoliaFourLeafMagnolia10 сарын өмнө
    • Yea but Even as a non catholic This is a place of worship not a park. If I imagine the golden temple in Amritsar being destroyed and then being rebuilt as some sorta recreational park. Many would be outraged.

      Chinggis HanChinggis Han10 сарын өмнө
  • This is the first one they've come up with that wasn't a modern-art disaster.

    AnarchoArchitectAnarchoArchitect10 сарын өмнө
    • A park on a cathedral? A place of recreation/noise on top of a quiet place of worship? Not a good idea.

      Chinggis HanChinggis Han10 сарын өмнө